I’m a citizen disappointed by the shallowness of our media and lack of honest examination of today’s deeper challenges. Such as coming to grips with what society has done to our Earth’s biosphere (life support system). I realize no one likes bad news, but faith-based denial isn’t going to do our children any good either.
~ ~ ~ Thus I’ve taken to writing what I'd like to see more of and to sharing selected writings of others.
~ ~ ~ feel free to copy and pass along any of the following.
Andy Robinson has been creating some excellent visualizations of Arctic ice loss data and I figured it's about time I feature some of his best work over here:
This letter of clarification from Dr. James Hansen seems to me a public document; one that will probably be widely misrepresented in short order, by folks who go to any length to distract from our real challenges. While there is no denying that some respectable experts have their disagreements with Dr. Hansen's assessment. That dialogue is continuing with scientific study, papers, peer review and much discussion among the community of experts. It should be seen as the science being alive and well. The serious debate continues healthy as ever, among the serious experts - and every year brings a bit more clarity. Through all this we the people need to understand, that scientific debate revolves around nuances that are dwarfed by all climatologists do understand... supported by all that's been observed these past decades. Below I have copied and reposted the complete text from James Hansen's April 15, 2013 statement.
{ http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2013/20130415_Exaggerations.pdf } Making Things Clearer: Exaggeration, Jumping the Gun,
and The Venus Syndrome
I'm including these because I believe they are must-listening for folks wanting to gain a better understanding of the sustained attacks climate scientists have been enduring.
Dear Society Driven Global Warming Skeptic: Can you outline the issues that need to be debated?
Of late, skeptics such as Dr. Spencer, Anthony Watts, Mr. McIntyre, etc... et al. Have been displaying great indignation that genuine practicing scientists and other climate experts refuse to "debate" with them. ~ ~ ~ In traveling around the blogosphere I read comments from many sincere folks who mirror Mr. Watts' vocal and melodramatic indignation over at WattsUpWithThat.com. And me, I wonder, in light of the past decades of the experts debating, and challenging each other - and in light of all we have observed, and all we have learned regarding the physics: What is it that the Dr. Spencers and Anthony Watts of the world want to debate anyways? ========================================= Dear Skeptic, can you outline the issues regarding our current society driven global warming knowledge that needs to be debated?
... a scientific review of the folds within folds of harmonic complexity that make up the 'valves' and 'pistons' of our global climate system.
A series of a video and videoed lectures from established practicing scientists, the experts who have committed their careers to understand these Earth systems. First, an overview. . .
Describing how scientists measured ocean temperature during the historic voyage of the HMS Challenger (1872-76) and how today's network of ocean-probing robots is changing the way scientists study the seas.
~ ~ ~
incidentally, UCTV - Perspectives On Ocean Scienceis an excellent source for years worth of noted scientists sharing their findings. If you're interested in real scientists as real people explaining their work, here's an excellent resource
Dr. Mitrovica does a wonderful job of explaining new findings regarding the interactions between melting ice sheets; gravity; and surface rebound which have enabled scientists to better estimate regional sea level rise for various geophysical scenarios.
Another interesting source for lectures by scientists and experts,
Mr. Taylor at Forbes has written another one of his regular melodramatic broadsides against climatologists, folks he refers to as "warmists" - refusing to recognize or admit that it's the science supported by Earth observations that are driving the climatological community's conclusions.
I took a break from the nightmares of the Echo-chamber to get back to a little fun science and Earth observations. Besides, I've been meaning to share this video since first watching it last year. Here is some very interesting and relatively new scientific understanding regarding sea levels and the changes we might come to expect. Dr. Mitrovica does a wonderful job of explaining the interactions between melting ice sheets; gravity; and surface rebound which have enabled scientists to better estimate regional sea level rise for various geophysical scenarios.
Geophysical Evidence
Jerry Mitrovica: The Fingerprints of Sea Level Change