But, rather than the denialist penchant for attacking the 'opponent,' I figure maybe I should get down'n personal about myself. It might help shed some light on folks like me and what drives our various blogging missions to expose more folks to the rational aspect of climate science... the things that Republicans and their professional denialists do everything to distracting us from.
Tell me again, why I shouldn't protect my blog from crazy incoherent flamers like a few I've run into?
Like I said I'll welcome any serious thoughtful "skeptical" comments - the evidence is coming in too fast'n furious for me to worry about avoiding your/their questions to the best of my ability and then to point to authoritative sources upon which I have built my opinion.
Just like it takes a deeper understanding of climatology to understand how the various formulas relate to real world interactions. Because without appreciating those subtle weather/climate dynamics you don't know how to apply those formulas you got there.
Actually considering my early two decades in restaurants, including managing and ordering, an acc't 101 adult ed course way back - and also some of the carpentry stuff, - it's not so far fetched. Besides, after four decades pretty much working full-time plus on my feet, it's nice to sit on my butt and earn money. So, I do have the basic understanding and the will.
Because, simply knowing how to do my portion of the accounting job well, does not give me the background or knowledge to figure out what those numbers actually mean so far as the operation of the facility.